Chateau Sociando Mallet 2003 Thursday, Aug 31 2006
Tasting Notes and France and Bordeaux and Variety and Red and cabernet et al
I had intended to grab a bottle of 2003 Grand Puy Lacoste but I could not pry the wooden case open using only my bare hands - not for want of trying - so I grabbed this Haut Medoc instead. I am a bugger for trying stuff as soon as I can. I like to form my own opinion of them as young wines. It is costly and most likely foolish but sometimes someone has to take one for the team. The last Sociando I had recently was the ‘85 which at twenty years is still drinking very well.
Aromas of blackberry/raspberry, mineral, flowers, aniseed and toasty pencilly oak. Nice smelling wine. On the palate flavours of blackberry/raspberry, cedar, pencil and a handful of dried herbs. Fine but firm strong tannins and quite fresh and lively. Linear palate - no flush of fruit or fatness. Strong finish. This should turn out to be a beauty.
Rated : 93+ PointsTasted : Aug06
Alcohol : 13%
Price : $70
Closure : Cork
Drink : 2013 - 2023+
Source : www.winestar.com.au
Print this article
eMail this article
I have been a bit tardy getting a note up on this wine. It has been in the inbox for a while and now it is in the outbox. I would have loved to have been a bureaucrat - especially if it involved using a big stamp that says ‘TASTED’ and then I could fill in the date and stuff. That would be exciting.
The fruit is from young vines with the first crop in 2002. If you are into these sorts of things I might mention that this undergoes a cold soak with about 10% whole bunches. No post ferment maceration. Oak maturation in mainly old French. Clones are 114, 115 and MV6. My problem is that when I think of Beechworth these days (as I often don’t) I usually find myself thinking of shiraz.
I have had a fair few vintages of the standard Montana pinot over the years and reckon that this is one of the better ones. Some years are a little tough and green but this one is pretty good. Contrary to the opinion of many I think that Marlborough does a good line in pinot - often better than some of the more glamorous NZ regions.
I visited this domain last year and discovered that The Prince has some. The colour is lovely, bright and deep. The nose is oozing cherries and a little spice. The palate is BIG. The tannins are somewhat softer than I expected but the fruit is lovely. The alcohol suggests more than the 13.5% on the label and it does look a little flabby. The wine was consumed blind alongside a number of other Pinots from the new world and although it had lovely length and flavour it could have been mistaken for a Californian wine. Lovely, but not sure if it will last to the next decade, but I would be happy to consume over the next few years.

I asked a few people if they would like to come along and taste some sauvignon blanc and some of the responses were - ‘Yeah right!’, ‘Pfffffffftttt’ and ‘Enjoy yourself’
A single vineyard wine from Orange, NSW. Interestingly enough I actually think it smells like orange..which is probably better than smelling like teen spirit. Oh denial!
Another sauvignon blanc from Marlborough and obviously 2006 looks like being a strong year. I tasted this alongside the Montana of the same vintage and it was neck and neck. Both excellent. Both same same but different!
I must admit that I have probably drunk more than my fair share of Montana sauvignon blanc over the years but this is by far the best one I can remember (no obvious pun intended…). I think Montana must have been about the last NZ winery to get with the program and use screwcaps but they have fixed this now too.
Oh dear. I meant to open the 2006 Wirra Wirra Adelaide Hills sauvignon blanc along with all the other SB’s but opened this by mistake. Hmmm. I thought it smelt a bit apricotty! Nice wine but.
The same group of friends got into a lot of discussion over this wine. I suspect that the problem related to any type of white being inside the brown paper bag and that this wine was not in the friends normal taste experience. Comments ranged from Pinot Gris to a blend of traminer and viognier!! The nose opens with apicot aromas and some apple blossom behind. It then seemed to show some matchstick (stink?) characters. On the palate it delivered more or less what the aroma indicated. Some commented that it had a bitterness on the finish that they often find associated with Viognier. At the price it is worth a try for those of you who want to look at Arneis, but some will like it and some will dislike it.
We do get out and about occasionally. Otway Estate has nice cottages that you can hire which we investigated on a day out. I was particularly taken with the Chardonnay so got this to have with friends (of the non winemaker variety) and masked bags of wine. The colour has a slight golden hue but its quite bright. For all of those going ballistic over the Curly Flat 2004, try this for size. Restrained nose that has Chablisesque like flinty tones moderating nut and citrus. The palate is light and complex. The flavour keeps rolling around for some time. This was a hit with all present except for one mate who likes heavier oak.
I offer you without any commentary the media release for the re-launch of the Rosemount brand. The picture is of the new diamond shaped bottles - now closed with screwcap. 


Ah the mysteries of wine (or humans). I reviewed this
For the 800th review on Winorama the wheel of fortune has spun and landed on The Hunter Valley and the 2005 vintage. Jackpot! Everyone is running around squealing and throwing their hands in the air. Well at least I am!
This is a 100 percent grenache based rose named after (or for) the winery cat.