Vasse Felix Heytesbury Chardonnay 2006 Tuesday, May 13 2008
Tasting Notes and Australia and Margaret River and Variety and White and chardonnay
I’m going on holiday tomorrow for a week and have about 40 notes I’d like to write up..but that’s not going to happen tonight. I’ll aim to knock up about six or seven and have them magically pop up each day in my absence….which may or may not make your little hearts grow fonder.
There’s a bit of spicy clove oak here but it sits comfortably on a bead of cream, lime/citrus and figs. It feels medium to full bodied and has a creamy yeasty texture with fine acidity pulling it into shape, freshening and lengthening the palate. Citrus, figs, spice and savoury lees are the main flavours and the finish is long, creamy and spicy but not without a bit of controlled flinty grip on exit. A top Chardonnay of complexity and sophistication that’s ready to go now.
Rated : 94 PointsTasted : May08
Alcohol : 13%
Price : $45
Closure : Screwcap
Drink : 2008 - 2012
Source : Winery Sample
Visit winery website
Print this article
eMail this article
I’m having a couple of major problems with all these 2005 Margaret River Cabernets, namely those of limited funds and finite capacity. This year’s Heytesbury is all Margaret River with just a sneaky little addition of 5% Shiraz and is a barrel selection rather than a single vineyard wine (as per usual). There won’t be a 2006 vintage release so the intention is to stretch this out until the 2007 Heytesbury becomes available.
A new label for the 2005 vintage (of which you can read more about in the excellent Moss Wood newsletter
Well this is one of the most attractive dry whites to have passed my lips in quite a while, so much so that I feel compelled to immediately put finger to keyboard. I was supposed to be tasting but I couldn’t stop drinking the bugger, so if you like a white Bordeaux style then I’d be all over this like a fat kid on a Lime Spider. Only 317 dozen made. 
I have been cracking through the old Chardonnay recently at a fair clip and have some pretty tasty items to write up. This is one of them, it has great appeal and they call it Xanadooooooo
X&Y, perhaps a good name to remind us that marketing people can quite often totally lose the plot? This is pretty good though and I quite like the concept and branding. Anyway, I just grabbed this bottle from the pile because a) I am feeling a bit snuffly and wanted to see if my eye was in, b) because it had been sitting in the pile for way too long and c) I saw it reviewed in yesterdays Sunday Telegraph. I’m feeling sort of OK about a), b) is good - more space and I think the trashiness of c) is best forgotten quickly.
This arrived yesterday, in amongst a couple of dozen other samples, and because I am a Cabernet man I wasted no time in tucking in. Too much Margaret River Cabernet is barely enough if you ask me. Anyway, I really like this and I have 92 or 93 scribbled on my pad, but as we all know (I hope) the score is only a small part of the story, so just to make it perfectly clear, this comes with my emphatic approval in all departments - value, quality, style etc. 

If you work on the assumption that both are reasonable possibilities, this is exactly the sort of wine I would grab from the bottlo if I had twenty bucks in my pocket and a bunch of friends who were passively interested in wine. It’s excellent juice and it delivers a whole bucket load of fruity action - but with a bit of style. For the record it’s 94% Chardonnay and 6% Sauvignon Blanc. I guessed it also had a bit of Semillon in the mix but I have been known to get these things wrong every now and then…..
A big black bottle holding a big black wine, and like last year’s effort, it really needed a day to start strutting its stuff.
Hmmm the weekend yielded about ten wines that I think I’ll write up. It seems a wee bit too early to be tasting some of these 2007 wooded Chardonnays I might add.
I don’t think I have had the standard Margaret River offering (not the Estate wine) since the 2001 vintage. That was an excellent wine and very fine value - clearly regional and varietal. This vintage also delivers a very good wine at a fair price but I’m not so sure that it’s particularly regional or varietal. Nonetheless. Release date May 2008.
I don’t drink much SSB or SBS (well I don’t really drink much of any one thing these days) but when in town Mr Walsh chooses to stay at the Margaret River. I like these blends better than straight Sauvignon Blanc as they have a bit more interest and usually have better shape through the palate. 
A big wine from a big year. This is 81% Cabernet, 14% Merlot, 5% Petit Verdot and 100% Margaret River. Of recent vintages it reminds me most of the brooding 2001 rather than the charming 2003.
My boy (of nearly four months) decided to practice his singing skills at 4.30AM so I decided to get up, keep him company, and knock out a few notes myself. Gooooooooo. Wagoooooo. Errrrhhhh. Arp. Arp. (and that’s just me). It’s a new thing, as is this wine, which I thought was called [indulgence] hence the highly self introduction but [invocation] it is. I did not have one handy at the time so the singing went on thorough the night. Cue Lionel Ritchie….
Prendiville (although it sounds like a character in an Oscar Wilde play) is a selection of the top 40 barrels of cabernet from Sandalford’s 1970 Wilyabrup plantings. It is, therefore, roughly a make of about 500 dozen. Prendiville my dear boy..
This is right on the money for the money (if that makes any sense). It’s a mix of Margaret River (66%) and Fergusson Valley (34%) fruit, sees 10% new oak and offers irresistible drinking at a modest price. I’d be all over this if I was in the market for a drink now dry white.
Hot on the heels of a conversation regarding filling a few holes in our collection of 1996 vintage Champagne, I commented to JP after tasting this that surely it must be a case purchase? ‘Now we’re talking’ she said, shortly followed by ‘Twelve years and he finally gets it!’ This is right up there with the 2002 in terms of quality and from the first sip I knew that this was the wine for me. The 2006 must be pants wettingly good if it’s any better than this…