Peter Howland Langley Vineyard Shiraz 2005 Wednesday, Jun 4 2008
Tasting Notes and Australia and Variety and Red and shiraz et al and Geographe
I had lunch at my local Italian with the affable Peter Howland the other day and had a preview of his 2005 release reds. There are three single vineyard Shiraz (what’s the plural eh Grant?) from WA in the portfolio and this wine from the Donnybrook sub-region of Geographe, although the least of them, is still a remarkable wine nonetheless. Perhaps if I had tasted it in isolation then it may have scored a little higher? I suspect I was blinded by the stars shining on either side (Parsons and Pine Lodge) of which more later…
It’s pretty to smell with ripe black cherry, plum, spice, menthol and a rosy vanilla fragrance wafting above. On the palate medium bodied and smooth with plenty of ripe tannin and balanced fresh acidity. It has highly attractive flavours of plum and dark cherry, pepper and tasteful vanilla cream oak - good fruit weight, although not especially deep, and a finish of good length. Very smart wine and beautifully made.
Rated : 93 PointsTasted : Jun08
Alcohol : 14.5%
Price : $30
Closure : Screwcap
Drink : 2008 - 2015+
Source : Winery Sample
Visit winery website
Print this article
eMail this article
7 Responses to “Peter Howland Langley Vineyard Shiraz 2005”
June 4th, 2008 at 11:12 am
It’s shirazez.
GD
June 4th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
gary, the website link shouldn’t have “.au” in it. All three Howland shiraz read well - though i am not one who likes to identify eucalypt in my shiraz.
June 4th, 2008 at 12:37 pm
Thanks. I fixed the link.
Yes..the Langley has a nice menthol lift, the Parsons it’s merely complexing but certainly there and the Pine Lodge may be over the top for some people - certainly has a coolness about it.
GW
June 4th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Sensational effort if the fruit is from Donnybrook … almost every wine I’ve had from there hasn’t been swallowed, so this must be a special patch of vines.
Do you know his production levels GW?
June 4th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
I don’t know but I’d not imagine it was huge..I can ask. I only call em as I see em Marky Mark.
GW
June 5th, 2008 at 12:27 am
For the plural of shiraz, I often use shiraz’, occasionally shirazes but prefer the former for some reason. Something seems to resonate from high school english about the plural of words finishing with soft consonants.
June 5th, 2008 at 5:40 am
Shiraz’ is so yesterday. Get with it or get left behind. Shirazez.